I've been quietly fuming for a couple
of days. Since Caroline Glick had a
column in Jerusalem Post titled "What
Europe wants".

The gist of the article is that France
wants to help the Arab countries rid
themselves of the Jewish problem. This,
according to a French EU parliamentarian,
is official French policy.

Standing before the EU parliament in
Brussels on May 16 2001, French EU
parliamentarian Paul Marie Couteax
made a stunning statement. After
condemning Israel's actions to defend
itself against Palestinian terrorism
as the "theocratic excesses of this
religious state," Couteax declared that
Europe should supply the Arab world with
nuclear weapons. In his words, "I have no
hesitation in saying that we must consider
giving the Arab side a large enough force,
including a large enough nuclear force, to
persuade Israel that it cannot simply do
whatever it wants. That is the policy my
country [France] pursued in the 1970s
when it gave Iraq a nuclear force."

This is a fairly interesting statement,
both because it seems not to have hit
the world media, and because it places
France in the curious position of being
a self-declared terrorist nation, bent
on supplying nuclear weapons to islamic
terrorists so that they can fulfill the
dreams of Iran's ayatollah Rafsanjani.

In short, France is both breaking the
UN non-proliferation treaty, and doing
so in order to set up a second holocoust.

This should have serious consequences,
both for France and any collaborators in
the EU, that second attempt on a "Festung
Europa".

A few things should now happen:

France should forfeit any nuclear force.
If the UN is unable or unwilling to
enforce its own rules (an easy call
to make, since the UN is as anti-
semitic as France), I'm sure that
the US and/or Israel would be able
to strip that terrorist entity of
any WMD capability.

France, never what you would call
a loyal NATO ally, should be booted
out of the alliance.

Sanctions. No nation should have
defense trade or ties with France.
The nation who let upwards of 14000
of its own elderly fry in the summer
heat should never become anything but
a pariah.

Actually, with this admission that
France was trying to give nuclear
weapons to Saddam Hussein, it would
seem that Israel (and really, the UN,
if the community wasn't rotting from
the inside) has a casus belli against
France.

This last week having been chock full
of the antics of "Washingtonienne" and
her private/public life, I finally went
out looking for a pic.

As usual, I didn't get to my goal
before I was sidetracked by something
more interesting.

A google search revealed the site
"washingtonienne.com". Hmmm, I thought.
This looks promising. It wasn't.

Washingtonienne.com is a redirect, to
Moveon.org.

The Washingtonienne domain was created
on May 19, 2004.

Just one of those weird little net
anomalies that keeps popping up
wherever lefties grow.

Weirdness out of the middle east is reaching
proportions surprising even me. And that is
bloody surprising.

Let's start with the fallout from the Abu
Ghraib pictures and all the "humiliation".

Reuters Staff Abused by U.S. Troops in Iraq

Two of the three said they had been forced
to insert a finger into their anus and then
lick it.

Color me unsympatethic. Reuters deserve far
worse than this. Listening for that small
voice of compassion, all I can get is "How
can this be? Wouldn't they have to take
their heads out first"?

Meanwhile, Israel is clearing out terrorist
nests and weapon-tunnels in Gaza, while Kofi
Annan, Colin Powell, the EU and all the
usual suspects squeal like stuck pigs. What
Israel really ought to do is send in a couple
divisions to take out the terrorist infra-
structure in the UN-building. I'd settle
down and watch that one, with lots of
popcorn.

Talking about Colin Powell: he ventured out
of the closet the other day, and won't be
able to hide again:


Speaking to a Dansih television channel,
Powell reiterated President Bush's support
for the Road Map peace plan and said that
Israel must be forced to act in accordance
with it.

Fancy that. And now he's bleating along with
Kofi over damages to the Hamas and Islamic
Jihad.

Actually, this kind of open antisemitism
from the US State Department is fully to be
expected, and I wouldn't be surprised if
Mr. Powell himself was really an Islamist.

That would explain the abuse of US taxpayers
money to spread Islam by way of the State
Department website, here:

Islam is one of the fastest-growing religions
in the United States today.

Titled "Muslim Life in America" this State
Department site is a glowing advertisment for
Islam and the Islamic way of life, provided
in English, Spanish, French, Russian, Arabic
(the Department's native language?), Chinese
and Persian.

Interestingly, the State Department does not
seem to have anything to recommend Buddhism,
Hinduism or Vicca. Christianity is right out,
and the mere mention of Judaism would
probably send the swamp's denizens into a
foaming, swastika-polishing frenzy.

So, ACLU, where are you on this blatant abuse
of a government site to spread religion?
What's that you say, boy? It's not a religion?
It's a criminal enterprise? So they get a free
pass?

Meanwhile, here's what American taxpayers
pay for:

US State Department islamic Photoalbum



At Greater Lansing Islamic School,
East Lansing, Michigan, students play at
the playground. (Courtesy Islamic Horizons)
© usinfo.state.gov/Islamic Horizons

And here is what the US taxpayers pay to
have removed:



Taxpayer money spreading Islam and erasing
the Ten Commandments. Isn't that special?

And as abuse, it makes the vaunted "prison
scandal" seem like a prank.

But Colin and his merry State Department
Jihadis are not the only ones popping up
when you start looking for abuse. The
State Department's partner of choice, the
purveyor of "legitimacy" (what we strait-
laced folks call galloping corruption),
the UN, is in hot water again. As is not
unusual, it is all about the children.
Paedophilia, to be exact.

The UN says its staff have been illegally
detained, while Eritrea accuses the
peacekeepers of serious crimes including
paedophilia.

Eritrea also claims the UN is destabilising
the region.

You think that's a coincidence? Or "an
isolated incident", as the saying tend to
go these days when a terrorist cell blows
up something.

Afraid not. Here's the next one, hot on
the heels of the first:

KINSHASA (Reuters) - The United Nations
mission in Congo said Monday it was
investigating allegations of sexual
abuse and exploitation of civilians,
including minors, by its staff serving
in the northeastern town of Bunia.

It should be abundantly clear by now that
the UN is, in itself, abuse. It is the
reign of people like Khomeini, Mugabe,
Amin, Assad, Arafat, Yassin and Carlos
given global scope and Nobel "Peace
Prices".

Where's the flood when you need it?
Actually, I'd settle for man-eating
locusts, if they'd just keep inside
the UN-building.

Like most others on the web, I've been
following the ongoing saga of the pics
released from the Abu Ghraib prison in
Iraq. The actual release of (classified?)
material was, for a while, a mystery.
No longer. Now, I'm more than slightly
irritated.

I'll skip Colonel David Hackworth's place
in the recent events. Everyone is talking
about that already. What interests me is
the good colonel's friends.

By his friends I'm thinking of an editor
of "Defensewatch" magazine. It seems that
the rag employs someone by the name of
Ralph Omholt. Mr. Omholt also would seem
to go by the moniker "Skydrifter". So, I
have a few questions for Mr. Hackworth.

1. Is Ralph Omholt one of your employees?

2. Is this: Skydrifter's page in fact that
Defensewatch editor's personal page?
Note: portrait and name is here.
It is featured as one of the very best
9/11 pages on Vanguard News Network,
a well-known neonazi site.

3. Do you endorse the views expressed
on that page?

Oh, and from what's floating around, it
seems that there's a very prolific poster
named "Skydrifter" on some chatboards of
the antisemitic variety. From what I've
seen, it looks like the same Skydrifter.

So, as a "Soldier For The Truth": would
you like to clarify?

This past week we have had even more
atrocious behaviour than usual from that
global mafia, the UN.

First out (or maybe second) was the UN
choice for High Poobah for Iraq, Lakhdar
Brahimi. Brahimi is a well known mouth
for the Arab League, and hasn't wasted
any time in making his antisemitism his key
issue: "The great poison in the region is
this Israeli policy of domination and the
suffering imposed on the Palestinians."

Yeah, right. This is a guy who defended
Saddam Hussein, who has worked and is
working to restore the Baathist positions
in Iraq, who the Kurds fear as much as
they feared Saddam - and with good reason.

Kofi Annan distanced himself from the
"Israel=Poison" statement from his Arab
underling, but later let that drop and
instead came out in Brahimi's defense.
No wonder John Kerry loves the man,
they have the same kind of two-faced
slipperyness. Like a rotting fish with a
head in each end.

Anyway, enough with Brahimi. There's
more filth floating in the UN bowl.

The Oil-for-food scam, also called the
UNScam, UNScum, and a host of other
fanciful terms. Benon Sevan, a close
associate of Mr. Annan and one of the
key players in the shenanigans, has
instructed that information is not to be
given to governmental authorities and
others investigating the scandal. Annan
has put his support behind this rather
curious initiative. Of course, there is
that embarassing little detail named
Kojo Annan too. So the necessary
information may have to be wrung out
out of the suspects hands, literally,
if it is ever to see daylight. Of course
it won't come to that: all these criminals
have diplomatic immunity. But they can
be deported.

Then there was the situation in Thailand,
where hundreds of islamic terrorists,
upon activation by their leaders, attacked
police and army posts. Since the islamics
seems to have been armed mainly with
machetes, the army and police made
short work of them. That was because
they were prepared. Had they been
unprepared, an attack by a machete-
wielding horde would have been quite
a nasty thing.

But the UN is offended, as usual when
an islamic terrorist is killed. Of course,
this ended with more than a hundred
dead terrorists, so the UN is in a state
of hysterical frothyness.

The "world body" is now demanding
that Thailand investigate the killings
in a prompt and satisfactory (to the
UN) manner. And think at least trice
before ever doing something like that
again.

And with that, we have arrived at the
UN Commision for Human Rights. The
person frothing at Thailand for killing
too many islamic would-be murderers
is Bertrand Ramcharan, the acting UN
High Commissioner on Human Rights.
No, it's not a joke.

The lastest from that august body is
that the US walked out of proceedings
to ensure that Sudan has a seat on the
Commission. Of course, Sudan is not
especially well known for its adherence
to human rights, being more famous
for its bustling trade in slaves and mass
murder, even genocide, of Christians.

Other members include such states as
Zimbabve, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Any
club involving Sudan, Zimbabve or Egypt
is likely to be corrupt, criminal, antisemitic,
genocidal and generally worth putting in
enforced quarantine for the foreseeable
future. Putting all these into a body
supposed to be looking after "human
rights" is probably as close as you can
get to terminal blasphemy without
getting hit by lightning.

So far, that is. But I'm praying every
day....